Logics for Insecure Communication
ثبت نشده
چکیده
We present a general setting for dynarnlc-epistemic logics for communication, which can express announcements of different types (public or private, truthful or not, reliable or not, secure or not etc.), queries of the corresponding types, complex dialogues, dialogue games, strategies (protocols) for communication etc. We analyze some examples, we discuss various properties of dialogues (normalcy, responsiveness, publicity, truthfulness, appropriateness of questions) which usually are tacitly assumed, and we formally define interesting types of dialogue which break these assumptions (rhetorical questions, eheatihg questions, Socratic dialogues, cheating by impersonation). We give an algorithm for computing the beliefs of the agents at the output-states, given their beliefs at the input-state and the the dynamic-epistemic features of the communication act. In the full paper, we give a complete and decidable axiom-system for each such logic.
منابع مشابه
(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare
Recent years have witnessed a parallel and seemingly contradictory trend towards both the standardization and the customization of healthcare and medical treatment. Here, we explore what is meant by ‘standardization’ and ‘customization’ in healthcare settings and explore the implications of these changes for healthcare delivery. We frame the paradox of these divergent and opposing factors in te...
متن کاملThe effectiveness of humor skills training in changing positive and negative affects evoked during conflict in coples with secure-insecure attatchment style
The use of humour in couple relationships is one of the constructive methods that help them to regulate their emotion. The aim of the present study was to determine the effectiveness of humour communication skills training in changing positive and negative emotions evoked during the conflict in couples with secure-insecure anxious attachment style. The present study is an experimental design wi...
متن کاملPersonalisation - An Emergent Institutional Logic in Healthcare?; Comment on “(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare”
This commentary on the recent think piece by Mannion and Exworthy reviews their core arguments, highlighting their suggestion that recent forces for personalization have emerged which may counterbalance the strong standardization wave which has been evident in many healthcare settings and systems over the last two decades. These forces for personalization can take very different forms. The comm...
متن کاملCompeting Logics and Healthcare; Comment on “(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare”
This paper offers a short commentary on the editorial by Mannion and Exworthy. The paper highlights the positive insights offered by their analysis into the tensions between the competing institutional logics of standardization and customization in healthcare, in part manifested in the conflict between managers and professionals, and endorses the plea of the authors for further research in this...
متن کاملIt Takes Two to Tango: Customization and Standardization as Colluding Logics in Healthcare; Comment on “(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare”
The healthcare context is characterized with new developments, technologies, ideas and expectations that are continually reshaping the frontline of care delivery. Mannion and Exworthy identify two key factors driving this complexity, ‘standardization’ and ‘customization,’ and their apparent resulting paradox to be negotiated by healthcare professionals, managers and policy makers. However, whil...
متن کامل